List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Prepare to change dies | 1.1 | Determine when changeover will be required, and plan requirements for die change |
| 1.2 | Obtain dies and/or cores and all parts and tools to match the production order |
| 1.3 | Follow procedure for machine close-down and for informing relevant personnel |
| 1.4 | Take last-off samples as required for die reports |
| 1.5 | Close down machine in accordance with procedures |
| 1.6 | Prepare machine for changeover in accordance with procedures |
|
2 | Change dies | 2.1 | Plan removal process to ensure no damage to self, equipment or others |
| 2.2 | Remove, clean and store die according to workplace procedures applying corrosion protection if required |
| 2.3 | Attach replacement die ensuring that locating devices and marks are matched and securing devices are installed and tightened to specification |
|
3 | Set dies | 3.1 | Set machine conditions for new die |
| 3.2 | Restart machine according to procedure |
| 3.3 | Dry cycle machine and die according to enterprise procedures |
| 3.4 | Check operation of die against product quality specifications |
| 3.5 | Check the first-off sample for compliance with required standards |
| 3.6 | Fine tune settings and other production variables as required |
| 3.7 | Note any equipment variances between actual production and documented set-up conditions |
| 3.8 | Complete workplace documentation and report to appropriate personnel |
|
4 | Anticipate die setting problems | 4.1 | Identify potential problems which may occur during the die changing and setting process |
| 4.2 | Determine possible causes of these problems |
| 4.3 | Identify most likely causes and prioritise appropriate actions |
| 4.4 | Rectify problems using appropriate solutions within area of responsibility |
| 4.5 | Recommend improvements in systems or procedures |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and demonstrate the ability to:
read and interpret procedures and job specifications
remove, clean and store die according to procedures
select dies, cores, parts and tools and install replacement die to meet specifications
set machine conditions for new die
check the installation and operation of new die to identify conformance and/or non-conformance to specifications
make adjustments to settings and equipment operation to rectify variations in equipment operation or product quality
identify hazards and apply relevant hazard controls
distinguish between causes of problems/alarm/fault indications, such as:
operational problems
instrument failure/malfunction
electrical failure/malfunction
mechanical failure/malfunction
wrong readings
equipment design deficiencies
product parameters (temperature, flows, pressure and levels)
resolve non-routine problems
communicate effectively with team/work group and supervisors
complete workplace records
do basic arithmetical manipulations, including additions, subtractions, divisions, fractions and percentages.
Must provide evidence that demonstrates knowledge relevant to their job sufficient to fulfil their job role, including knowledge of:
construction of simple dies and their components, including fixed and removable cores, inserts, ejection systems and vents
methods of connecting dies to machines
impact of incorrect or faulty fitting
function of machine settings and appropriate ranges of settings for specific dies
routine and non-routine problems that may arise, the range of possible causes and appropriate actions
organisation procedures relevant to the work environment/job role
hierarchy of control
hazards that may arise in the job/work environment and:
their possible causes
potential consequences
appropriate risk controls.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
In all plants it may be appropriate to assess this unit concurrently with units such as:
teamwork
communication.
The collection of performance evidence:
should occur over a range of situations which include typical disruptions to normal, smooth operations and provide for demonstration of responding to problems
will typically include a supervisor/third-party report or other evidence, focusing on consistent performance and problem recognition and solving. A supervisor/third-party report must be prepared by someone who has a direct, relevant, current relationship with the person being assessed and who is in a position to form a judgement on workplace performance relevant to the unit of competency
must include the use of industry appropriate materials, tools, equipment, data and documentation
may use industry-based simulation for all or part of the unit particularly where safety, lack of opportunity or significant cost is an issue.
Assessment should occur in operational workplace situations. Where this is not possible or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors assessment must occur in a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment that reflects realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from demonstration of skills and one or more of:
walk-throughs
pilot plant operation
industry-based case studies/scenarios
‘what ifs’.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews.
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment shall demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they shall assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on the job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.